Tip: Select
a length for advanced search!
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letters | Answer | Clue | ||
| 99% | 4 | Exact Match! | ||
noun • a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | ||||
| 35% | 7 | Numbers yet to be crunched | ||
noun • unanalyzed data; data not yet subjected to analysis | ||||
| 34% | 9 | Crunched the facial features | ||
adjective satellite • having eyes half closed in order to see better | ||||
Numbers To Be Crunched
Check other possible answers below.
Best Possible Answers
Users Also Searched For These Clues...
We think you're currently doing a New York Times crossword, and other users also searched for these clues:
Clue Last Found In...
| Source | #Number | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| New York Times17 Oct 2011 | Across 65 | |
This clue was last seen in the publications above.
| ||
How's It Work?
Our Data
Our database consists of millions of crossword clues, anagrams, synonyms and more. We have over 9 million crossword clues with answers, 5 million synonyms and over 10 million anagrams. We also keep track of popular crosswords such as the New York Times(NYT) with the dates and answers for your convenience.
Even if we don't have the clue in our database, we can still find the answer for you. Simply filter by number of letters and enter any characters that you know of, and our algorithm will return any matching words or phrases.
Alternatively you can use our Known Letters Finder Tool
Check out past New York Times clues and answers, or the NYT Mini Crossword
Similar Clues
| Clue | Source | |
|---|---|---|
➡️ | Capable of being crunched | |
➡️ | Crunched numbers
New York Times -
15 Oct 2009 | New York Times / 15 Oct 2009 |
➡️ | Crunched the facial features | |
➡️ | Numbers yet to be crunched
New York Times -
22 Dec 2008 | New York Times / 22 Dec 2008 |
➡️ | Stuff to be crunched
New York Times -
25 Aug 1999 | New York Times / 25 Aug 1999 |
➡️ | They're crunched
New York Times -
31 Mar 2005 | New York Times / 31 Mar 2005 |
➡️ | They may be crunched in a gym
New York Times -
01 Jan 2003 | New York Times / 01 Jan 2003 |
